Across The Universe: Worst Movie Ever?
There is a new sheriff in town. As of now, Battlefield Earth is but a deputy alongside Gigli and Little Nicky. The new worst film in the history of the world is Across the Universe. Call me a sensationalist; I don’t care, this movie sucks – A Tour De Manure.

Like any self-respecting music fan, I creamed in my pants when I heard about the release of a new coming-of-age story in the late 60s set entirely to the music of the Beatles. I mean, what could go wrong. This sounds like a recipe for a masterpiece. Let’s fire up the bong and head to the theater right? WRONG.
In all my haste and excitement, I overlooked one very important detail. The movie is not set to the music of the Beatles, but rather the movie is entirely comprised of the actors and actresses performing the music of the Beatles. In other words, it’s a musical. Read on for more of Rupert’s rant about Across The Universe…
Now don’t get me wrong, Across the Universe is filled with some talented actors and performers and some of the songs (ok, a couple) sounded pretty good, but you really have to love musical theater to tolerate this piece of self-indulgent crap. I kid you not, I sat beside a guy seemingly pretty compatible in my tastes and he burst out laughing in embarrassment at least as many times as I did. There was definitely an unspoken understanding between us of, “Where are we, how the hell did we get here, and most importantly, how do we get out?”
The placement of the songs was entirely contrived and forced. Only Broadway directors and actors would think this works on the screen: introspective singing alone by the beach with cliché crashing waves, underwater artsy mermaid performances, and my personal favorite, the girl (Prudence) who is feeling sad and locks herself in the closet only to be serenaded back to happiness by a group of friends singing, “Dear Prudence, won’t you came out and play?’
Re-swallow the puke.
And how many endings does a movie really need? This movie literally had an ending (with a full solo performance of a song of course) for every single cliché ’60s plotline. I actually finally walked out and never saw the real ending, but it was mainly due to the fact that I had to pee so bad from waiting so long for the stupid thing to end.
The interesting thing about Across the Universe is that I hated this movie so much; I kinda want to see again. But I want to rent it and buy a lot of beer. It’s the kind of movie that sucks so bad that you should get a bunch of friends together and get drunk and throw empty cans at the TV set. To see it in the theater evokes too much anger for anybody to cope with in public, but in the privacy of your own home, this might just be fun. I will say it did have some sweet psychedelic scenes, but not nearly good enough to pull it from the gutter. Regardless, anyway you cut it, this is the worst movie ever made.
If anyone else saw Across the Universe, I’m dying to know your opinion. Although, I expect you’re probably all smart enough to know better.














[...] March 18, 2008 in across the universe, beatles, entertainment, movie, movies, worst ever by hookakat1 Tags: across the universe, beatles, entertainment, movie, movies, worst ever http://www.glidemagazine.com/hiddentrack/across-the-universe-worst-movie-ever/#more [...]
The placement of the songs was entirely contrived and forced.-Agreed
This movie literally had an ending for every single cliché ’60s plotline.-Agreed
I thought that Bono and Joe Cocker were interesting. Some of the imagery was interesting and I liked that parts of it were updated from the old Beatles cartoons. Even the fake “Jimi Hendrix” going solo was fun (I’d really like to see more footage of Jimi playing the small clubs in London) But, it completely reminded me of the time my sister made me go see the awful Broadway play “Moving Out” where they stick all the Billy Joel songs together and try and hatch a plot out of it. Honestly if they wanted to make a movie based loosely on the facts with great music they should have taken their cues from “I’m Not There”, especially the scenes with Heath Ledger…
I’ve seen it twice now, once in the theater and at home last week, but I don’t think it’s as terrible as you make it sound. Sure, some of the parts are cliche and contrived, but can you really talk about the Beatles’ music in the context of the ‘60 and not be a little cliche?
I thought the film was very visually appealing, the whole Dr. Robert scene and the Mr Kite scene were great. I didn’t like the way they mixed and combined real characters with fake ones. The main guitarist represented hendrix, but not really, and Bono seemed to be playing Dr. Robert and Kesey at the same time.
And on the music, did they even have permission to use the actual Beatles’ recordings? I assumed that’s why the went with the musical concept, not the other way around. But I think having the characters sing showed that the Beatles’ music was more than just a background soundtrack, that people actually lived it and celebrated it in their lives.
While not a perfect execution, I think this is an enjoyable flick for any Beatles’s fan (isn’t that everyone?).
I’m gonna have to disagree with this. I enjoyed this movie so much I had to see it again. The fact that it’s not set to the music of the Beatles made me appreciate it even more. It’s a very simple love story told through the Beatles music. The movie is far from perfect but it’s extremely uplifting and entertaining. The variations of all The Beatles songs makes it all the more interesting.
agreed… as a fan of both The Beatles and director, Julie Taymor, i was very excited about this movie. I don’t think i lasted more than 20 minutes until i decided i had to leave the theater before the film ruined another one of my favorite songs.
i think it very well may be the worst movie ever.
fucking boo.
Around The Fire > Across The Universe
If you didn’t realize from the preview that this movie was a musical then you are the idiot. The movie was a great journey through the 60s, with some good covers of the songs. But to say that this movie sucked because it is a musical is ludicrous. This guy probably hated the modern day musical Once as well cuz he thought it wasn’t going to be singing in the movie.
It’s a weird thing with this movie. I watched the whole thing all the way through, and on many occasions it felt uncomfortabel, and at other times I thought to myself “I cant believe I’m watching this”, but when it was done, I realized I’d enjoyed it. Go figure.
The performance of the young boy singing Let it Be was worth the price of the DVD.
I actually wrote about how I really liked Once on here before. Once was a great story with songs that fit perfectly. This movie just crammed a bunch of songs into a story, resulting just a klunky mish mash of a 60s plot.
I didn’t get very far into this garbage before turning it off. I was so ready to LOVE it and I don’t mind musicals, in some cases I would say I like them (used to do musical theatre myself) but but this movie was completely un-watchable. What a shame. I couldn’t tolerate it enough to get into the psychedellic scenes… which I was loooking forward to.. that and seeing Eddie Izzard, oh well. Maybe some day I’ll give it another try but I agree whole heardetly with the writer here.
robert stigwood and the bee gees didnt kill the beatles. yoko and linda didn’t kill the beatles. nixon didn’t kill the beatles. mark david chapman didnt kill the beatles.
however, bono in this movie? THAT killed the beatles.
Agreed with the article–this movie was absolutely horrible. The singing left a lot to be desired, the story was seemingly written by monkeys at typewriters, and there was no consistent direction.
My take on it was that the director couldn’t decide what she wanted to do with the movie. Parts of it were psychedelic and visually interesting and crazy. Other parts of it were played like a straight musical. It flipped back and forth between the two too often for either to work. Had she chosen to go one way or the other, I think there could have been a lot of potential.
And don’t get me started on the performances. Yeah, they’re actors, not singers, but come on. That was atrocious.
I couldn’t agree more with this review. Across the Universe was the biggest disappointment of my life! I cried, not because I was moved by the story, but because something so special to my heart had been butchered and served on a platter for dimwits who know nothing about the Beatles to eat up. I can only assume people who liked this movie were non-Beatles fans, and did not like the original songs in the first place. Each song was strung together by the director in an attempt to make something coherent. Her failure resulted in a drawn out and yes very contrived piece of crap. I mean could she have forced any more Beatles references down our throats (including that every single character’s name was from a song’s lyrics), as if we were supposed to find this clever and amusing. I will stand by your statement that his IS in fact the worst movie ever!!!
Hmmm… I enjoyed it. Wasn’t perfect, but I loved how they changed the arrangements of some of the classic songs. “I wanna hold your hand” was beautiful. Completely changed the way I hear the song.
I think it could probably have been done better, yeah. But it sure as hell also could have been done A LOT worse.
Plus, I was expecting a musical. I thought everyone was? Guess not.
The director did a much better job with Frida, but I still enjoyed this one.
Wow.. so much for artistic free thinkers on the net.. your reviews are very much what I would expect of American TV addicts. I realize I am wasting my time even writing this as it will likely fall on ignorant ears but here goes…
The musical re-arrangements in this movie are tremendous and the story line succeeds in joining the meanings behind the Beatles songs it features to the music. The musical arrangements and the flow of the show are fantastic. The Beatles would be proud of the political ramifications and historical context that are brought to the fore with this creative bit of genius.
The backgrounds in each scene reflect emotions of the scenes 100%. If you don’t understand this maybe sign up for an intro to literature class at your local college and get an education and appreciation for something other than TV. A history class wouldn’t hurt you either.
The Beatles music reflects emotions, politics, and the lived human experience of the 60s. This movie presents everything the Beatles stood for by pushing the meaning behind the songs to the front. Cliche is a vehicle in this movie, not an artifact.
P.S. It might be time to turn OFF your TVs and go to some live performances.
SteveM
Hey .. big Beatles fan here … and have no problem recommending the movie to my students. Dont like it .. go create one of your own, I’ll watch it.
Loved it!
Will definitely watch again when it gets to DVD here in NZ. I thought Jim Sturgess was great as Jude and as a filmmaker myself I couldn’t help but be blown away by the overall production. I just wouldn’t even know where to start to put together a movie such as ATU. Its definitely a movie that some people won’t get but an enjoyable ride for those that do.
4 out of 5 for this Beatles fan.
This movie suck!
The psychedelic part is like a joke, i wonder if the director or anybody in this hole movie took LSD or at least a joynt in they re entire life?
The covers made me considered about what the fuck i am doing with my life!
I thought Across The Universe was amazing. The soundtrack changed my life. I love the beatles lyrics but I definately think the Across The Universe covers of the songs were much better than the original versions. Not to mention Jim sturgess’ voice was absolutely infactuating. Overall the movie was extremely creative and I would watch it over and over again.
I totally disagree with this article, and I think whoever wrote this probably could of been more professional about the whole thing to be honest. I think this movie was wonderful, it was long because you can’t cram the way the Beatles revolutionized and changed that whole era into an hour. Not that many people truly understand what they did during this time. They gave people something to believe in and something to stand up for, which people today are really losing sight of today. The time right now everyone seems to be more infatuated with themselves, i really think we need a revolution! This movie really opened up my eyes to all of this. Brilliant!
I have to say I am a big fan of this movie, and I am really happy to read that some others enjoyed it, too. I love the Beatles, their music, and what they stood for very much. And I just really enjoyed the journey that this movie took me on. I loved the performances of the actors; Jim Sturgess was truly an amazing talent. I think the songs were done well. Of course no one will compare to the originals themselves, but as new renditions I really really enjoyed the music of this movie. It was very creative, and I think it must have been a very hard task to make a plot out of the songs, so I have a lot of respect for those involved in putting this whole piece together. I love the feel of it, and I love hearing the music. <3
:)
I see both sides t the arguement. I really do. I personally loved this movie, but because my dad grew up with the Beatles I realize that he finds no appeal in this movie and I understand why he will never watch it.
I really enjoyed it, but I do concur with both sides.
I saw this movie a few days ago for the first time, and have watched it three or four times. It was wonderfully creative and very well thought out. I have always been a pretty big fan of the Beatles, but this movie really opened my eyes to some of the songs I had not heard of before as well as giving new life to some of the classics. I understand that a lot of the songs may have not translated into the movie as their original meanings were intended, but it was very tastefully done. I love this movie!
Loved the movie, loved the music (can definitely hear the T-Bone Burnett influence)….
I totally understand that this will not be everyone’s cup of tea, but for me, it really, really worked.